ONTAC-WG General Discussion (thread)

[ontac-forum] [Fwd: [ontolog-forum] Ontolog Invited Speaker -Dr. Nicola Guarino - Thu 2006.02.02], Peter P. Yim, 2006/01/30
[ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/22
- Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Azamat, 2006/01/23
- Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/23
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Chris Menzel, 2006/01/23
- RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/23
- RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/23
- RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/23
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/23
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Azamat, 2006/01/24
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/25
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - lastchance to vote. ), Obrst, Leo J., 2006/01/22
[ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/21
- Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., richard murphy, 2006/01/21
- Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Ralph Hodgson, 2006/01/22
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Obrst, Leo J., 2006/01/21
- Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/21
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Danny Ayers, 2006/01/21
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Danny Ayers, 2006/01/21
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 2006/01/21
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Azamat, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 2006/01/22
    - Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 2006/01/22
    - RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - lastchance to vote. ), Chris Partridge, 2006/01/22
    - RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class -lastchance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 2006/01/22
    - RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class-lastchance to vote. ), Chris Partridge, 2006/01/22
    - Re: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote. ), Smith, Barry, 2006/01/22
    - RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs.Class - last chance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 2006/01/22
    - [ontac-forum] Muddle surrounding misuse of 'concept', Smith, Barry, 2006/01/23
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Muddle surrounding misuse of 'concept' and 'ontology', Azamat, 2006/01/23
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Azamat, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cory Casanave, 2006/01/22
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 2006/01/22
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cory Casanave, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - [ontac-forum] A farewell to classes, Chris Menzel, 2006/01/23
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Tim King, 2006/01/21
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Elkin, Peter L., M.D., 2006/01/21
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Arun Majumdar, 2006/01/21
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/22
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Arsic, Antoinette, 2006/01/22
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Roy Roebuck, 2006/01/22
- Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/22
  - RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Partridge, 2006/01/22
- RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/23
[ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/21
- Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Smith, Barry, 2006/01/21
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/21
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Pierre Grenon, 2006/01/21
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 2006/01/22
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Pierre Grenon, 2006/01/23
RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub ( 10), richard . murphy, 2006/01/20
- RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub ( 10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/20
FW: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/19
- Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 2006/01/20
- RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 2006/01/20
  - Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 2006/01/20
- RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 2006/01/20
  - Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 2006/01/21
- RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 2006/01/21
  - Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 2006/01/21
[ontac-forum] Discussion discipline, Hans Teijgeler, 2006/01/17
- Re: [ontac-forum] Discussion discipline, Rich Morin, 2006/01/17
[ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Hans Teijgeler, 2006/01/16
- [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/16
- [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Ken Ewell, 2006/01/16
[ontac-forum] Re: ontac-forum Digest, Vol 9, Issue 23, Ken Ewell, 2006/01/15
[ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, Gary Berg-Cross, 2006/01/15
- RE: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support forinteroperable systems, Hans Teijgeler, 2006/01/15
  - RE: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to supportforinteroperable systems, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/16
- Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/15
  - Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/15
    - Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/15
RE: [ontac-forum] List reply function and ONTAC-dev list - Clarification, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/15
[ontac-forum] List reply function and ONTAC-dev list, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/14
[ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/14
- Re: [ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Peter Yim, 2006/01/14
- RE: [ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Obrst, Leo J., 2006/01/14
[ontac-forum] Test message-- ignore, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/14
[ontac-forum] turning to a sociological framework, Ken Ewell, 2006/01/12
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable -Cyc definitions?, Roy Roebuck, 2006/01/12
- [ontac-forum] List email style, Chris Menzel, 2006/01/12
[ontac-forum] The concept of 'purpose' relative to the construction of ontologies, Allen Matthew, 2006/01/12
- Re: [ontac-forum] The concept of 'purpose' relative to the construction of ontologies, Arun Majumdar, 2006/01/12
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable - Cyc definitions?, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/11
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable - Cyc definitions?, John Cabral, 2006/01/12
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable [Note on Institutions (again)], richard . murphy, 2006/01/11
- [ontac-forum] Dagstuhl seminar papers on integration, Chris Menzel, 2006/01/11
RE: [ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, Niemann . Brand, 2006/01/10
RE: [ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, Arsic, Antoinette, 2006/01/10
[ontac-forum] RE: introduction - TopLevel hierachy links, Cassidy, Patrick J., 2006/01/06
- RE: [ontac-forum] RE: introduction - TopLevel hierachy links, Hans Teijgeler, 2006/01/07
[ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, susan . turnbull, 2006/01/06
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/06
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/12
  - Message not available
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/12
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Chris Menzel, 2006/01/12
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/12
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/13
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/14
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/14
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/14
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/14
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/14
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/05
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/06
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/12
  - Message not available
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/12
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 2006/01/13
  - Message not available
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/14
[ontac-forum] Introduction, Hans Teijgeler, 2006/01/05
[ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/04
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/05
  - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/05
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/05
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/05
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/05
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/05
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Anand Kumar, 2006/01/05
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/05
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/05
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/05
- [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Gary Berg-Cross, 2006/01/09
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/10
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/09
  - Message not available
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/10
- RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Arsic, Antoinette, 2006/01/11
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
  - [ontac-forum] Summary of pi calculus and situation calculus, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/11
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, David Eddy, 2006/01/11
  - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/11
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
    - RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable [Note on Institutions (again)], Arun Majumdar, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/12
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/13
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John Cabral, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 2006/01/11
    - Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 2006/01/11
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, richard . murphy, 2006/01/11
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 2006/01/11
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, marc . wine, 2006/01/14
Re: [OS-ERA] [ontac-forum] Re: Future directionsfor ontologiesand terminologies, Arun Majumdar, 2006/01/02
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: Future directions for ontologiesand terminologies, Cory Casanave, 2006/01/02
- Re: [ontac-forum] Re: Future directions for ontologiesand terminologies, Arun Majumdar, 2006/01/02