Really?
The "logical language" and "upper ontology" communities and purpose are
quite different? How Odd!
And all the languages are confused and do not satisfy the sorts of standards
placed on ontology work? How Sad! (01)
-----Original Message-----
From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Smith, Barry
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:20 PM
To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion
Subject: RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote. (02)
Cory suggests: (03)
>lets decide on our language before having 100 emails on each of many
>terms that is well defined in that language. (04)
Unfortunately the existing languages were developed and documented
for quite different purposes and quite different communities. Their
definitions do not satisfy the sorts of standards placed on ontology
work -- sometimes because they are confused; sometimes because they
are defining terms (like 'class') as these terms are used in
logico-linguistic contexts, rather than in ontological contexts.
BS (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (07)
|