ONTAC-WG General Discussion (date)

ONTAC-WG General Discussion (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

January 30, 2006

[ontac-forum] [Fwd: [ontolog-forum] Ontolog Invited Speaker -Dr. Nicola Guarino - Thu 2006.02.02], Peter P. Yim, 13:15

January 25, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cory Casanave, 06:12

January 24, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Azamat, 14:01

January 23, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cory Casanave, 20:32
Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, John F. Sowa, 15:37
RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cassidy, Patrick J., 14:10
RE: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 12:29
Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Chris Menzel, 12:10
[ontac-forum] A farewell to classes, Chris Menzel, 11:51
Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Michael Gruninger, 11:41
Re: [ontac-forum] Muddle surrounding misuse of 'concept' and 'ontology', Azamat, 06:56
Re: [ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Azamat, 06:23
Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Pierre Grenon, 02:02
[ontac-forum] Muddle surrounding misuse of 'concept', Smith, Barry, 01:58
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 01:16

January 22, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Partridge, 23:50
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 23:08
[ontac-forum] Result of vote: Type, Cassidy, Patrick J., 22:24
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Michael Gruninger, 20:18
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 18:55
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 18:42
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Roy Roebuck, 15:42
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - lastchance to vote. ), Obrst, Leo J., 13:30
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs.Class - last chance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 13:27
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 13:06
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Ralph Hodgson, 12:28
Re: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote. ), Smith, Barry, 12:25
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class-lastchance to vote. ), Chris Partridge, 12:24
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 12:19
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class -lastchance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 11:55
Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 11:23
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Arsic, Antoinette, 11:16
RE: Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - lastchance to vote. ), Chris Partridge, 11:12
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 11:03
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Azamat, 10:41
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 10:36
Intension and Extension (Was RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote. ), Cory Casanave, 10:34
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cassidy, Patrick J., 10:16
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 10:12
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cory Casanave, 09:34
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 09:19
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cory Casanave, 09:13
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Smith, Barry, 08:40
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., John F. Sowa, 08:26
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Azamat, 05:25

January 21, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., richard murphy, 17:31
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Chris Menzel, 15:56
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Arun Majumdar, 15:45
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Danny Ayers, 15:31
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Danny Ayers, 15:26
Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Pierre Grenon, 15:22
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Elkin, Peter L., M.D., 15:18
Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 13:22
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Tim King, 13:14
Re: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Michael Gruninger, 12:57
Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 12:20
RE: [ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Obrst, Leo J., 12:20
[ontac-forum] Type vs. Class - last chance to vote., Cassidy, Patrick J., 12:07
Re: [ontac-forum] Before we start..., Smith, Barry, 09:55
[ontac-forum] Before we start..., John F. Sowa, 09:44
RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 03:06
Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 00:10

January 20, 2006

RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub ( 10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 11:46
RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 11:10
RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub ( 10), richard . murphy, 11:03
Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 09:51
RE: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Roy Roebuck, 08:03
Re: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Azamat, 06:58

January 19, 2006

FW: [ontac-dev] RE: [ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 23:20

January 17, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Discussion discipline, Rich Morin, 14:50
[ontac-forum] Discussion discipline, Hans Teijgeler, 14:36

January 16, 2006

[ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Ken Ewell, 20:34
[ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Cassidy, Patrick J., 10:47
RE: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to supportforinteroperable systems, Cory Casanave, 07:31
[ontac-forum] RE: Shall we start? - sub (10), Hans Teijgeler, 03:35

January 15, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, John F. Sowa, 22:14
[ontac-forum] Re: ontac-forum Digest, Vol 9, Issue 23, Ken Ewell, 11:55
Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, Smith, Barry, 11:42
Re: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, John F. Sowa, 11:33
RE: [ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support forinteroperable systems, Hans Teijgeler, 09:30
[ontac-forum] RE: framework approaches designed to support for interoperable systems, Gary Berg-Cross, 08:47
RE: [ontac-forum] List reply function and ONTAC-dev list - Clarification, Cassidy, Patrick J., 08:21

January 14, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Obrst, Leo J., 15:29
Re: [ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Peter Yim, 12:45
[ontac-forum] List reply function and ONTAC-dev list, Cassidy, Patrick J., 12:18
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, marc . wine, 11:49
[ontac-forum] WARNING! -- 'Reply' function changed, Cassidy, Patrick J., 11:01
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 09:46
[ontac-forum] Test message-- ignore, Cassidy, Patrick J., 09:03
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 09:02
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 08:50
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 05:20
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 01:04
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 00:46

January 13, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 19:08
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 19:07
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 17:17
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 09:14
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 09:00
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 08:40
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 07:10
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 06:59
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 01:18
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 00:25

January 12, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 22:19
[ontac-forum] turning to a sociological framework, Ken Ewell, 21:50
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable - Cyc definitions?, John Cabral, 15:03
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 09:50
[ontac-forum] List email style, Chris Menzel, 09:13
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable -Cyc definitions?, Roy Roebuck, 08:29
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 08:27
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 08:20
Re: [ontac-forum] The concept of 'purpose' relative to the construction of ontologies, Arun Majumdar, 07:52
[ontac-forum] The concept of 'purpose' relative to the construction of ontologies, Allen Matthew, 07:13
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Chris Menzel, 07:03
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 03:27
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321, 03:12

January 11, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable - Cyc definitions?, Cassidy, Patrick J., 21:58
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 14:13
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John Cabral, 14:01
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 13:14
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 13:07
[ontac-forum] Dagstuhl seminar papers on integration, Chris Menzel, 12:57
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable [Note on Institutions (again)], richard . murphy, 12:42
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable [Note on Institutions (again)], Arun Majumdar, 12:27
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 12:14
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 10:54
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 10:28
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 09:38
[ontac-forum] Summary of pi calculus and situation calculus, John F. Sowa, 09:35
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 08:51
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 08:06
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 07:51
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 07:29
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, richard . murphy, 07:28
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 07:15
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 07:01
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, David Eddy, 05:41
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Arsic, Antoinette, 05:37

January 10, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 22:49
RE: [ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, Niemann . Brand, 13:59
RE: [ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, Arsic, Antoinette, 13:09
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 08:08

January 09, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 20:26
[ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Gary Berg-Cross, 13:34

January 07, 2006

RE: [ontac-forum] RE: introduction - TopLevel hierachy links, Hans Teijgeler, 00:31

January 06, 2006

[ontac-forum] RE: introduction - TopLevel hierachy links, Cassidy, Patrick J., 15:52
[ontac-forum] Fw: Invitation to Expedition Wkshp on January 24 at NSF - Bootstrapping Service-Oriented Architecture through Communities of Interest, susan . turnbull, 14:19
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 13:41
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 05:33

January 05, 2006

Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 08:37
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Michael Gruninger, 08:14
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 07:23
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Anand Kumar, 07:08
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Azamat, 06:56
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 06:20
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 06:11
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 05:56
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Cory Casanave, 05:47
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 04:57
[ontac-forum] Introduction, Hans Teijgeler, 04:41
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, Smith, Barry, 03:23

January 04, 2006

[ontac-forum] Re: The world may fundamentally be inexplicable, John F. Sowa, 20:36

January 02, 2006

Re: [OS-ERA] [ontac-forum] Re: Future directionsfor ontologiesand terminologies, Arun Majumdar, 20:05
Re: [ontac-forum] Re: Future directions for ontologiesand terminologies, Arun Majumdar, 14:59
RE: [ontac-forum] Re: Future directions for ontologiesand terminologies, Cory Casanave, 14:25