ontac-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Categorization (was RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes)

To: "ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion" <ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321" <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:33:54 -0000
Message-id: <A94B3B171A49A4448F0CEEB458AA661F02CE5607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Barry,    (01)

This does not answer my question, which is not about the difference
between a set and a type, but between the difference in nature of the
membership/instance of relationship.    (02)

So please what is different in the nature of these relationships (not
thing things they bring things into relationship too)?    (03)


Regards    (04)

Matthew West
Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager
Shell International Petroleum Company Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom    (05)

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/    (06)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontac-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontac-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Smith, Barry
> Sent: 04 February 2006 13:41
> To: ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion
> Subject: RE: Categorization (was RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of
> attributes)
> 
> 
> 
> >MW: Noone has yet been able to explain the difference (or 
> even offer an
> >explanation) though more than one has asserted a difference. 
> I am simply
> >seeking enlightenment.
> 
> Sets are mathematical objects; the set-membership relation is an 
> abstract relation, which obtains independently of time and change. 
> Sets can be defined arbitrarily, as in the {the moon, Matthew West, 
> redness, 27} case. Sets are subject to arbitrary iterations, 
> combinations and intersections, ad nauseam, as in the
> 
> {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{Matthew West}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
> 
> case. Which sets exist is a matter of mathematics and of 
> arbitrary definition.
> 
> Types are entities (something like invariant patterns, commonalities, 
> kinds) in reality. Which types exist changes from epoch to epoch 
> (Darwin tells us) and even from year to year (as new varities of 
> potato chip are invented). Which types exist is a matter of 
> observation and scientific exeriment. Types are not subject to 
> arbitrary iterations, combinations and intersections. There is no 
> type 'rabbit or steering wheel'.
> 
> BS
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/
> To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (07)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/
To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (08)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>