To: | "ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion" <ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321" <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:24:29 -0000 |
Message-id: | <A94B3B171A49A4448F0CEEB458AA661F02B997A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Dear Charles, (01) But this is not quite what I (at least) think. (02) See below (03) Matthew (04) > -----Original Message----- > From: ontac-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ontac-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Charles > D Turnitsa > Sent: 01 February 2006 15:15 > To: ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion > Subject: RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes > > > If we are in agreement that a process ("Matthew living his > life") has an > object ("Matthew") (05) MW: My living process is the me physical object. They are coincident at all points in time. (06) > that is modified to reach different states > through that > process (07) MW: There may also be external processes that have an effect. (08) > - can not the process itself have different sub-processes (I > believe the agreed to answer here is yes), and are those sub-processes > distinguishable from each other through the exhibition of different > attributes? (09) MW: Thats OK with me. So we can have my digestive process, my circulatory process etc. We can also have my youth and my old age. (010) > This question was being discussed about a week > or two back, > before the group got preoccupied with defining a type. > > Chuck > > > > > > >MW: If the pictures were of the same object, then they > would all look > > >the same, but they do not. This is because they are > pictures of states > > >of me at different times in my life. The states are > different, and this > > >is why the pictures are different, but the states are all > states of my > > >life, which is why they are all pictures of me. > > > > Aha: "pictures of states of me at different times in my life" > > So Matthew HAS a life. And he (Matthew) is experiencing different > > states at different times in this life. > > Very good. > > BS > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/ > To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (011) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/ To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (012) |
Previous by Date: | RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes, Smith, Barry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [ontac-dev] ISO15926 and sets and types, Smith, Barry |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes, Smith, Barry |
Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes, Smith, Barry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |