ontac-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontac-dev] Types, sets, extensions.

To: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>, ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion <ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
From: "Smith, Barry" <phismith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 10:18:16 -0500
Message-id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060202101757.04836fa0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
At 09:57 AM 2/2/2006, you wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:46:31AM -0500, Barry Smith wrote:
> > Types have extensions, which are sets.
>
>Unless it is the type SET (among others).  There is no set of all sets,
>according to our best theories of sets (as you know).    (01)

Types have extensions, which are sets (if you're lucky)
BS     (02)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/
To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (03)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>