soa-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [soa-forum] Business Need for SOA (Was SOA Semantic Variation )

To: Service-Oriented Architecture CoP <soa-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Andrew S. Townley" <andrew.townley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 08:47:42 +0100
Message-id: <1143791262.3950.29.camel@macross>

Thanks, Joe.  However, I'd probably screw that up too and not pronounce
it correctly! :)    (01)

btw, I did send Rebekah a sheepish apology off-list.  I should've known
how your systems were set up from seeing your posts before, but at the
time, I only looked at the "From" line in the message.  I'm surprised
you folks don't change it in your mail clients, but then sometimes
nothing surprises me about corporate IT anymore...    (02)

<piss-take-techie-joke>
Then again, you could always use XML
</piss-take-techie-joke>    (03)

ast    (04)

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 00:36, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> But you can call me Chiusano anytime ;) 
> 
> Joe
> 
> Joseph Chiusano
> Associate
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>  
> 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
> Washington, DC 20005
> O: 202-508-6514  
> C: 202-251-0731
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: soa-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:soa-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Metz Rebekah
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 5:43 PM
> To: Service-Oriented Architecture CoP
> Subject: RE: [soa-forum] Business Need for SOA (Was SOA Semantic
> Variation )
> 
> Hi Andrew - 
> 
> FYI:  
> My first name is Rebekah, my last name is Metz.  Our corporate email
> standard is <last name>_<first name>.  With an uncommon spelling of my
> first name, I've thrown a few people for a guess.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: soa-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:soa-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrew S. Townley
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: Service-Oriented Architecture CoP
> Subject: RE: [soa-forum] Business Need for SOA (Was SOA Semantic
> Variation )
> 
> 
> Hi Metz,
> 
> I just wanted to address one of your points, because I believe that this
> clarification is crucial to understanding where I'm coming from with
> this line of thinking.
> 
> On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 19:20, Metz Rebekah wrote:
> > One of the largest benefits of autonomy is the ability to work
> > 
> > co-operatively to accomplish a larger goal.  However, this "directed"
> > or
> > 
> > "cooperative autonomy" is only effective if everyone fully understands
> > 
> > what they are supposed to do and have the ability to do it.
> > 
> > [->] I agree with your assertion of directed vs. cooperative autonomy.
> 
> > I believe there is a continuum between these two extremes.
> > I would liken the first to the hierarchical structure of the military 
> > and the second to a think tank or research institution.  What we see 
> > though is that there are a range of organizational (community) 
> > structures that work in between these extremes.  My sense is that 
> > within those various organizational structures; not everyone fully 
> > understands what they are supposed to do, nor do they have the ability
> 
> > to fully do it.  Nevertheless, the overall organization can be 
> > successful.  Essentially, the community becomes self-healing.
> 
> Actually, in this case I was lumping them together, not separating them.
> Although, I do agree that in practice there is some difference. 
> However, in any hierarchical organization (that is at all successful),
> there is a certain amount of delegation to people at all levels.  This
> delegation also provides the context and the reasoning necessary for
> action.  The results of that action may be directed if they are
> delegated from someone who has a vision or goal in mind.  They may also
> not provide all of the information available.  Perhaps my use of "fully"
> in this case was misleading.  What I actually meant was that they have
> enough information to perform the task to which they have been assigned,
> but the successful completion of that task will further the goals of the
> organization or individual who originally assigned it.
> [->] OK.  I think we agree.  
> 
> In my mind, the only difference between "directed autonomy" vs
> "collective autonomy" is what you alluded to in your reply--dependent
> vs. independent action.  However, the net results are the same because
> the successful results of either directed or collective action
> (hopefully) provides benefits to the community.
> 
> [->] Rebekah
> 
> ast
> 
> --
> Join me in Dubrovnik, Croatia on May 8-10th when I will be speaking at
> InfoSeCon 2006.  For more information, see www.infosecon.org.
> 
> ************************************************************************
> ***************************
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
> privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the intended
> addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of
> this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention,
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient,
> please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and
> delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your
> system.
> ************************************************************************
> ***************************
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
> Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/ Community Wiki:
> http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
> Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/ Community Wiki:
> http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
>http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
> Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
> Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
-- 
Join me in Dubrovnik, Croatia on May 8-10th when I will be speaking at
InfoSeCon 2006.  For more information, see www.infosecon.org.    (05)

***************************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  
Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is 
unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any 
review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or 
omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this 
message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies 
thereof from your system.
***************************************************************************************************
 _________________________________________________________________
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP    (06)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>