Patrick,
I'm interested in your Common Semantic Model sub-working
group. (01)
Only I don't really know what kind of practical contributions
could I produce in your WG from remote, being based in Europe where
the best thing that I have seen so far, a semantic model developed by a
number of mainly European Corporations, that I had a chance to revise a
few weeks ago, could be characterized - in my opinion - as
oversimplified, compared with the scope of a comprehensive CSM (the
first user and the driver of a modern World-Class Common Semantic Model
should be first of all the USA ambit because of the level complexity and
of the diffusion of advanced technologies that you have). (02)
So as in IEEE 1600.1 WG, most of the time I remain silent because I
don't like to express just opinions. (03)
If this is ok for your group I'll be glad to be added to your list. (04)
Best wishes. (05)
Roberto Bordogna. (06)
Dr. Eng. Roberto Bordogna
Corso Magenta 32 20123 Milan Italy.
tel 39.02.8690867
bordogna@xxxxxx (07)
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 04:50, Cassidy, Patrick J. wrote:
> ONTACWG: Common Semantic Model Working Group
>
> One of the sub-working groups of ONTACWG that was formed at the Oct.
> 5th meeting was the Common Semantic Model (COSMO) Working Group
> (COSMO-WG, until a better name is suggested). There were a number at
> the meeting who did not indicate an interest in participating in the
> subgroup who will look into the issues of what Common Semantic Model to
> adopt, and how to do it; so I would suggest that these discussion be
> conducted by email among the subgroup, rather than by email to the
> whole list. But the discussions will be open, and if anyone wants to
> just lurk and listen to the email discussions about the Common Semantic
> Model send a note to myself or the list, and your name will be added to
> the circulation list for those notes.
>
> We have begun to discuss how to approach the question of deciding on a
> COSMO, so if you have any interest in participating, please let me know
> ASAP. Members may join or leave at any time, but we will want to make
> some progress as soon as possible, and some decisions may have to be
> made soon.
>
> Current members of the WG are:
> Eric Peterson; Dagobert Soergel; Roy Roebuck; Olivier Bodenreider; Pat
> Cassidy; Antoinette Arsic; James Schoening; Gary Berg-Cross; Adam Pease
>
> If your name is not on this list and you want to participate or listen
> in, send me a note. There is one remote participant who indicated an
> interest, but the name was not clear over the telephone; please let me
> know who you are.
>
> Pat
>
> Patrick Cassidy
> MITRE Corporation
> 260 Industrial Way
> Eatontown, NJ 07724
> Mail Stop: MNJE
> Phone: 732-578-6340
> Cell: 908-565-4053
> Fax: 732-578-6012
> Email: pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
> To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
> Community Wiki:
>http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG
-- (08)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (09)
|