talk about off your rocker, dude, you're not lucid, have you taken your
medication today ... (01)
--
Best wishes, (02)
Rick (03)
email: rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.rickmurphy.org
cell: 703-201-9129 (04)
Paul S Prueitt wrote:
> Rick,
>
>
> One point of the previous discussion is that one wanted a specification of
> concepts without the first order logic.
>
> Your ranking of best practices, in line with the Industries that are
> dedicated to obtaining contracts with the government for IT services, is to
> rank Topic Maps at the bottom because it does not make the mistake of
> entangling complicated and often non-sensical "logic" into the ontology.
>
> This is like saying, well I am no expert on Buddhism, but the guy that
> founded it must have been off his rocker.
>
> It is disconcerting that one can state principled points of discussion which
> are simply ignored by a process that is going to do what it is going to do.
>
> There is a sense that this type of government, controlled by the whims of
> business processes, has to stop soon.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (06)
|