To: | "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321" <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:51:15 -0000 |
Message-id: | <A94B3B171A49A4448F0CEEB458AA661F02A80974@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Dear Barry, (01) > Uniquely, among existing > contributions, the BFO Relation Ontology allows the drawing of a > clear distinction between relations on the level of instances (e.g. > between your heart and your body) and relations on the level of types > (e.g. between the type human heart and the type human body). (02) MW: Just for the record, ISO 15926 also supports this. (03) Regards (04) Matthew West Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager Shell International Petroleum Company Limited Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom (05) Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538 Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx http://www.shell.com http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/ (06) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/ To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (07) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] ISO 15926 and BFO, West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontac-forum] Re: can an ontology be merely a set of well defined concepts, on logic?, John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontac-forum] ISO 15926 and BFO, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-forum] ISO 15926 and BFO, Smith, Barry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |