ontac-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontac-forum] ISO 15926 and BFO

To: "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321" <matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:05:38 -0000
Message-id: <A94B3B171A49A4448F0CEEB458AA661F02A80972@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Sir,
 
ISO 15926 has a number of parts. Part 2 is an upper ontology that has nothing in it specific to Oil and Gas Production facilities. Part 2 has 201 entity types (classes and relations).
 

Regards

Matthew West
Reference Data Architecture and Standards Manager
Shell International Petroleum Company Limited
Shell Centre, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom

Tel: +44 20 7934 4490 Mobile: +44 7796 336538
Email: matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.shell.com
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/

-----Original Message-----
From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of psp
Sent: 19 November 2005 17:19
To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion
Subject: [ontac-forum] ISO 15926 and BFO

ISO 15926 is an ontology developed to be an ontology about Gas and Oil Production facilities. 
 
Is there a subset of this that has all Gas and Oil Production concepts removed.  If so, or it not, what might be the size of the set of concepts.
 
What is the set of the set of concepts in BFO?
 
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>