The steps I outlined could certainly applied to any subset of upper level
ontologies. We start with those that are of particular relevance to
Federal government.
There is also a question of whether we should focus on
- entity types (called semantic types in the UMLS-SN)
- relationship types
- subject fields/disciplines and their upper subdivisions or facets
I do not mean to imply that these are mutually exclusive, they are
just pragmatic divisions. The CYC upper ontology mixes all
three.
Having directed a dissertation applying the UMLS-SN, I can only agree
with Barry. My student made a number of suggestions.
DS
At 10/9/2005 07:06 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
As Olivier will confirm, there
are many things wrong with the UMLS-SN, which is why an effort is
currently on-going to rebuild it.
BS
At 06:30 PM 10/9/2005, Cassidy, Patrick J. wrote:
Dagobert,
That looks like an excellent summary of a methodology to
find
commonality among the existing UOs.
I mentioned in a previous note that I though that it might
be
helpful to focus initially on that part of existing UOs required to
formalize and relate several existing Knowledge Classifications such
as
the UMLS-SN, FEA-RMO top level, and DoD Core Taxonomy top level.
Do
you view such a focus as consistent with the overall plan you
describe?
Pat
Patrick Cassidy
MITRE Corporation
260 Industrial Way
Eatontown, NJ 07724
Mail Stop: MNJE
Phone: 732-578-6340
Cell: 908-565-4053
Fax: 732-578-6012
Email: pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dagobert
Soergel
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 3:19 PM
To: ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ontac-forum] Upper ontology / common semantic model
I am separating out this part of the thread.
I apologize if some of this is obvious. It is often "hard
to
understand what is understood".
This is a suggested plan of work for the upper ontology subgroup
1 Collect suggested upper
ontologies
2 Compare and determine
differences
2.1
In elements (presence / absence and, more difficult,
definition)
2.2
in relationships
3 Try to resolve differences,
creating a superstructure that
incorporates
the non-contradictory
parts of various schemes
3.1
By adding elements
3.2
By adding relationships
4 Articulate the remaining
differences so that they are clearly
understood
In addition, the subgroup should deal with ontologies that can be
reused in many contexts, such as an ontology of time concepts.
My reworking of the WordNet top level (attached) may be useful in
this
context.
DS
Dagobert Soergel
College of Information Studies
University of Maryland
4105 Hornbake Library
College Park, MD 20742-4345
Office: 301-405-2037 Home:
703-823-2840 Mobile:
703-585-2840
OFax: 301-314-9145
HFax: 703-823-6427
dsoergel@xxxxxxx
www.dsoergel.com
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post:
mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files:
http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post:
mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files:
http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG
Dagobert Soergel
College of Information Studies
University of Maryland
4105 Hornbake Library
College Park, MD 20742-4345
Office: 301-405-2037 Home:
703-823-2840 Mobile:
703-585-2840
OFax: 301-314-9145
HFax: 703-823-6427
dsoergel@xxxxxxx
www.dsoergel.com
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (01)
|