John,
Great ! It expressed in the Pragmatism as each person has his own
Umwelt. And it is not easy to find a "common understanding" .
See the "mid-range" part of my paper -
http://ototsky.mgn.ru/it/21abreast.htm (01)
Leonid - http://ototsky.mgn.ru/it (02)
Вы писали 29 мая 2006 г., 17:47:21: (03)
> Folks, (04)
> There is certainly room for disagreement on many issues,
> but let's focus the disagreement on the issues themselves
> and not make derogatory statements about anybody's character. (05)
> Re criticisms of mode of expression: (06)
> There are two fundamental points about criticism: (07)
> 1. Any educated reader who says that a statement is unclear is
> almost always right: if they found it unclear, it's unclear. (08)
> 2. But anyone who tries to clarify someone else's unclear
> statement is almost always wrong: if they found it unclear,
> they're unlikely to find the intended meaning in it. (09)
> Therefore, please accept any criticisms about something being
> unclear by rephrasing the statement in a different way. But
> don't get angry over grammar. (010)
> John Sowa (011)
--
С уважением,
Leonid mailto:leo@xxxxxx (012)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (013)
|