We are not ignoring it.
At 06:47 PM 12/4/2005, you wrote:
>Dear Barry and Garry,
>As an ontology software engineer, I carefully examining the EIS
>Ontology and found it very
>good and highly valuable for knowledge-intensive applications. The
>USECS documentation is more fundamental, systematic and useful than
>other long-existing alternatives such as CYC, SUMO, and WordNet.
>Crucially, it also covers the respected knowledge references as
>Britannica's subjects, Webster's Dictionary, Great Ideas, Web
>Directories, and UN classifications of industry and products. Thus
>it permits to construct rich ontologies in any domain of knowledge
>or practice or business.
>I would like to ask a question: is it being ignored just because the
>author used capital letters on the web site?
>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's
>Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
>To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/