[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontac-forum] Our prayers have been answered

To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Smith, Barry" <phismith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:01:36 +0100
Message-id: <>
We are not ignoring it.
BS    (01)

At 06:47 PM 12/4/2005, you wrote:
>Dear Barry and Garry,
>As an ontology software engineer, I carefully examining the EIS 
>Ontology and found it very
>good and highly valuable for knowledge-intensive applications. The 
>USECS documentation is more fundamental, systematic and useful than 
>other long-existing alternatives such as CYC, SUMO, and WordNet. 
>Crucially, it also covers the respected knowledge references as 
>Britannica's subjects, Webster's Dictionary, Great Ideas, Web 
>Directories, and UN classifications of industry and products. Thus 
>it permits to construct rich ontologies in any domain of knowledge 
>or practice or business.
>I would like to ask a question: is it being ignored just because the 
>author used capital letters on the web site?
>Alan Green
>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's 
>FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
>To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
>Community Wiki: 
>    (02)

Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (03)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>