[Top] [All Lists]

[ontac-forum] Our prayers have been answered

To: ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Lidia Lutsko" <artsap4@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 19:47:19 +0200
Message-id: <BAY24-F2147010B93726094F490E1FE4E0@xxxxxxx>
Dear Barry and Garry,    (01)

As an ontology software engineer, I carefully examining the EIS Ontology and 
found it very
good and highly valuable for knowledge-intensive applications. The USECS 
documentation is more fundamental, systematic and useful than other 
long-existing alternatives such as CYC, SUMO, and WordNet. Crucially, it 
also covers the respected knowledge references as Britannica's subjects, 
Webster's Dictionary, Great Ideas, Web Directories, and UN classifications 
of industry and products. Thus it permits to construct rich ontologies in 
any domain of knowledge or practice or business.
I would like to ask a question: is it being ignored just because the author 
used capital letters on the web site?    (02)

Alan Green    (03)

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/    (04)

Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>