| To: | "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| From: | "Barnett, Dee CSM USA Directorate of Doctrine" <dee.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:53:23 -0500 | 
| Message-id: | <6B483EA3D6FDAA43B973E2D8BC28E2E825FF28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| You all are the subject 
matter experts here.  Most of what you are saying, I barely get.  I am 
in the WG because of my involvement in an Army project.  As I try to read 
all of this, though, his comments and responses are as valid as any others, so 
why would somebody want to silence him? Dee K. Barnett CSM (R) Contractor, ASRC Communications Intelligence Support to Counter IED Directorate of Doctrine US Army Intelligence Center Comm: 520-538-1182 DSN: 879-1182 From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Cassidy, Patrick J. Sent: Mon 11/21/2005 10:10 To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion Subject: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings In response to a note to him concerning the content of 
his postings, Paul Prueitt has requested that the members of the ONTACWG 
explicitly state whether they want to see more postings from 
him: [PSP] I am happy to not make 
anymore posts if the majority of those in the working group who wish to vote 
will ask this of me.  So please vote - but do it publicly.  
 Since 
we have over 100 members, some of whom have already expressed to me their wish 
that postings be fewer and adhere more closely to the purposes for which the 
working groups was created, it would produce less distracting email if the 
process were inverted -- those who **do** wish to receive more postings from 
Paul Prueitt (PSP), may send a note publicly to the list or, if you prefer not 
to contribute to excessive email for other members, you can send a note to both 
myself and to Paul Prueitt directly.  This question will remain open until 
Tuesday night, and I will post the result on Wednesday. If 
fewer than 25 members express a desire to see additional postings from Paul 
Prueitt, I would suggest that those discussions be conducted via a direct e-mail 
list of interested individuals.  If 25 or more, the question will be 
presented as a formal vote for the entire group. Any 
decisions I take can be reversed by a majority vote of the members of 
ONTACWG. Pat Patrick Cassidy _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/ To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (01) | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] A suggestion for ontological discussions at ONTACmeetings., psp | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, dbedford | 
| Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |