To: | "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Barnett, Dee CSM USA Directorate of Doctrine" <dee.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:53:23 -0500 |
Message-id: | <6B483EA3D6FDAA43B973E2D8BC28E2E825FF28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
You all are the subject
matter experts here. Most of what you are saying, I barely get. I am
in the WG because of my involvement in an Army project. As I try to read
all of this, though, his comments and responses are as valid as any others, so
why would somebody want to silence him?
Dee K. Barnett CSM (R)
Contractor, ASRC Communications
Intelligence Support to Counter IED
Directorate of Doctrine
US Army Intelligence Center
Comm: 520-538-1182
DSN: 879-1182 From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Cassidy, Patrick J. Sent: Mon 11/21/2005 10:10 To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion Subject: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings In response to a note to him concerning the content of
his postings, Paul Prueitt has requested that the members of the ONTACWG
explicitly state whether they want to see more postings from
him:
[PSP] I am happy to not make
anymore posts if the majority of those in the working group who wish to vote
will ask this of me. So please vote - but do it publicly.
Since
we have over 100 members, some of whom have already expressed to me their wish
that postings be fewer and adhere more closely to the purposes for which the
working groups was created, it would produce less distracting email if the
process were inverted -- those who **do** wish to receive more postings from
Paul Prueitt (PSP), may send a note publicly to the list or, if you prefer not
to contribute to excessive email for other members, you can send a note to both
myself and to Paul Prueitt directly. This question will remain open until
Tuesday night, and I will post the result on Wednesday.
If
fewer than 25 members express a desire to see additional postings from Paul
Prueitt, I would suggest that those discussions be conducted via a direct e-mail
list of interested individuals. If 25 or more, the question will be
presented as a formal vote for the entire group.
Any
decisions I take can be reversed by a majority vote of the members of
ONTACWG.
Pat
Patrick Cassidy _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/ To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] A suggestion for ontological discussions at ONTACmeetings., psp |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, dbedford |
Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-forum] Off-topic postings, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |