CDSI WG, (01)
Thanks to all for your valuable input. (02)
Attached is latest draft of the paper, with most of the comments
addressed. Please review and submit further proposed changes. Broad
comments are welcome, but are often too hard to nail down or work with. At
this stage, please submit specific proposed changes in the form [change
"XXXXXXX" to "YYYYYYY"]. (03)
1. Comment: Paragraph on "Semantic Web community" needs to be more positive
Proposed Resolution: Paragraph heading changed to "World Wide Web Consortium
(W3C) Doing Much – But Not This." Rewrote most of this paragraph. (04)
2. Comment: Explain CDSI is not the end-all, other barriers also exist.
Proposed Resolution: Added this to end of paragraph F: "Beyond Semantic
Interoperability, in the figure above, are the Logic, Proof, and Trust layers,
which are critical also. For example, if computers could someday search the
Semantic Web and find and understand a source of data, they would still need to
determine if they could ‘trust’ the data for the intended purpose. Solving
Semantic Interoperability will not provide the total solution to enterprise
data interoperability, but it is a major portion of this challenge." (05)
3. Comment: Need better definition of data interoperability.
Proposed Resolution: Changed heading of Part-I, Paragraph F to read "Data
Interoperability has Multiple Layers -- All Critical. This paragraph could
probably be improved to better define the many layers of data interoperability.
Any volunteers? (06)
4. Comment: Add use case(s) to better explain requirements Proposed Resolution:
One Use Case added after Abstract. Additional Use Cases could be placed in an
Appendix or the body of the paper. Any volunteers to draft them? (07)
5. Comment: Is goal no-humans-in-loop, or is some amount acceptable?
Proposed Resolution: DoD Netcentricity requires "unanticipated" use of data,
by humans and applications. So, the goal is no-humans-in-the-loop. That is
not possible today, so we do what we can. If it is never possible (which we
don't know), we will have to do what we can. But this paper calls for the
pursuit of the goal. (08)
6. Comment: Define Intended Audience
Proposed Resolution: "Intended Audience" paragraph added after Abstract on page
2. (09)
Additional comments were submitted via email and will be responded to in
separate emails, but the proposed changes are included in the attached draft. (010)
James R. Schoening
C-E LCMC CIO/G6 Office
Voice: DSN 992-5812 or (732) 532-5812
Fax: DSN 992-7551 or (732) 532-7551
Email: James.Schoening@xxxxxxxxxxx (011)
Data Interoperability Across the Enterprise 28Dec06 1600.doc
Description: MS-Word document
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG (01)
|