[cuo-wg] Interop Wider Technology Focus

["Adrian Walker" <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All --

Adrian Walker here, newbie to the group.

As James said, there is exciting new technology out there, but how do we make it solve the interop problems?

I'd humbly suggest  that , while a CUO may be a necessary 
component for interop, it will not be sufficient.  The technology
focus should therefore be wider.

This is argued in general terms in [1,2] .  The basic idea is that
part of the essential semantics is hidden in application code -- what
will applications do with CUO terms -- and that technology to make that part transparent and auditable, at the business level, is needed.

I'm sure there will be lots of good discussion around this and other topics.  Just wanted to get my 2 cents in early.

                                             
-- Adrian

[1]  http://www.semantic-conference.com/program/sessions/S2.html

[2]  http://www.reengineeringllc.com/A_Wiki_for_Business_Rules_in_Open_Vocabulary_Executable_English.pdf

Internet Business Logic (R)
Executable open vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering
Phone: USA 860 830 2085



 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG    (01)