To: | usaspending-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | susan.turnbull@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:20:15 -0500 |
Message-id: | <OF4E67C1B6.7ACFB9FF-ON852573B9.008032B4-852573B9.008032B9@xxxxxxx> |
Message received by STurnbull for posting to USASpending forum:
I think modeling the USASpending.org site after the OMBWatch site, was a good decision.
One big concern I have is with a problem that should be fixable without too much effort.
FIPS 95 and FIPS 55 have been important tools for reporting data accurately. Even if a document is outdated, for instance FIPS 95-1, it still should be referenced when an unfamiliar Agency code appears in the Contracts or Assistance data. My concern for the immediate future is who will be making sure "Unknown" doesn't appear in data that obviously should have that information? If the Federal Government awards money to a recipient, I don't think a Congressman nor a citizen wants to see a record that indicates that the Agency that gave away millions or even billions of dollars can't be identified. I know that is not the case, based on my research on your Web site, but I recommend cleaning it up early before someone thinks there is a greater problem. My concern for the long-term future is as to what mechanisms Federal agencies have implemented to insure the quality of the data that is being reported to the USASpending site? If an agency doesn't appear to know its own agency codes and/or if GSA isn't validating the agency codes of the data that is submitted, it gives me less confidence about the rest of the data. The FIPS publications that I mentioned are going and agencies are supposed to make sure their data is current and accurate, so it is important that each one understands how important this is and enacts the appropriate measures. I have included in the table below some of the types of problems I noticed. I have also included references to relevant documentation to help in resolving them. I have not written this email to cause anyone harm or embarrassment, but the nature of this data requires that all efforts are taken to insure its accuracy. With that in mind, you don't have to publish this email to your public forum, so long as the issues are addressed. You are free to decide that one way or another. You can also contact me if you have any questions. Thanks. <<USASpending Web Site - Data Concerns.xls>> Cedric Stroud
How am I doing? Please take a few minutes to complete this survey. Thank you.
CAO Web Assistance Hotline: 202-226-2140
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/usaspending-forum/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/usaspending-forum/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/USAspending/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?USAspendingGov Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/ To Post: mailto:usaspending-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [usaspending-forum] How to fix naming errors, Bob Beattie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [usaspending-forum] Data Quality Problems with Agency Codes, including examples, susan . turnbull |
Previous by Thread: | [usaspending-forum] How to fix naming errors, Bob Beattie |
Next by Thread: | [usaspending-forum] Data Quality Problems with Agency Codes, including examples, susan . turnbull |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |