|
There is a generalization of the notion of super-Distribution to include digital object instrumentation that is not purely economic and transactional in nature.
If this instrumentation is seen as creating un-solvable social issues, and it easily could be seen in this light; then the concepts I am presenting may be spun in a direction that makes the future conversation more difficult than need be.
If the instrumentation is not coupled with the core back-plate concept of generative seeds, then the instrumentation itself would add one more layer to already far to complicated and (often overly) dysfunctional enterprise systems.
If there is market competition over the back-plate itself; then the user communities will not express a collective intelligence shaping the specific implementations of back-plates. This would restrict the use of the concept for perhaps a generation.
Thus I have argued that a single payer (the US government) should own the back-plate and should make all activity in the back-plate vendor agnostic. This ownership itself must have transparency so that private interests are not given undue advantages.
These issues are subject to memetic manipulation, and our political and business environments have this type of manipulation down as a fine art. So the second school has prepared specific responses to anticipated spins.
There is always an ability to say something that moves the discussion in a direction where others who really are not even thinking about the details might spin the discussion in such a way that the insights that might be provided cannot be re-expressed.
This potential is clearly present, and demonstrated, in the case with the e-Gov groups.
There are other projects, including the large funding allocation to Stanford from NSF on a Blank Slate Internet.
references:
Prueitt, Paul S. The Blank Slate Internet Prueitt, Paul S. Fractal entailment in Anticipatory Systems
National Project to Establish the Knowledge Sciences:
|