soa-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [soa-forum] RE: SOA Community Demo Con Call

To: Service-Oriented Architecture CoP <soa-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Service-Oriented Architecture CoP <soa-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "David RR Webber (XML)" <david@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:21:15 -0700
Message-id: <20060323072115.dc066b1d4d2e0a1a65719ae85a8071e6.06260cee24.wbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Andrew,
 
I share the concern here that this approach is not pluralistic and encompassing - but instead narrowly focused and constrained.  Obviously with demo's it hard to chew off too much - but my sense is too much is being left on the table / glossed over.
 
I concur that the priniciples illustrated do not reflect enough of a multi-integration scenario.  If real life was this easy - we'd have nothing to prove here!!! 
 
Plus - we can already see sites like http://webservices.amazon.com which appear to mostly do what the demo is proposing - and are fully operational ( does this really reflect SOA for eGov?).
 
One glaring aspect left on the table (that Amazon.com also illustrates) is the need to authenticate partners and provide a secure access model.   The government really has not got this correct yet IMHO.  It either goes wildly the one way - requiring excessive sign-up criteria taking days/weeks to acquire - or throws the door wide open and leaves participitants potentially exposed to abuse - and in either case, management and control and scalability are indeterminant.
 
Probably better to address the conceptual vision of what an SOA constitutes in an eGov context - before we rush into providing demo's of raw technology...
 
It might also make sense - given that this topic is obviously extensive - to in fact break down the SOA domain into descreet parts - and then look at producing demo's for individual parts.  That I believe would be clearer for people and give better balance around what choices are out there and key requirements to be fulfilled - to be able to constitute a robust SOA environment.
 
Thanks, DW


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [soa-forum] RE: SOA Community Demo Con Call
From: "Andrew S. Townley" <andrew.townley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, March 23, 2006 8:55 am
To: Brand Niemann <bniemann@xxxxxxx>, Service-Oriented Architecture CoP
<soa-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi all,

I'm not sure if the conference call is open or not, so I'll just give
some initial feedback on the straw man here--assuming that you want a
few opinions about the specification.  Please don't take these as being
over critical, because I'm just trying to help.

I think what you guys are trying to do is great, but I'm wondering what
implementing the spec as-is will prove.  The reason is that, if I've
read the document correctly, you're effectively talking about a "green
field" type of project with centralized control and everything being
defined by MDA.  I don't really see how this will prove anything other
than SOAP/WSDL + WS-* will allow you to do distributed computing.  You
could do this with CORBA/J2EE and tunnel everything over port 80 with
standardized data formats.

I think the demo will only really provide value if it takes a more
real-world look at the scenario.  I think this can be accomplished by
including the following things:

    1. Including evolution of a message definition and, since you're
       using WSDL, a service interface, and
    2. including some sort of recognition that in an actual scenario,
       you're more likely going to be dealing with a variety of message
       types which are structurally different but represent the same
       semantic concept.

If you don't take these things into account, you're not really dealing
with SOA, but a very limited-use, vertical Web services network.  I also
think, to be realistic, you're going to need to deal with certain fault
conditions to prove how flexible the SOA community is when things
break.  Are there intermediaries?

Also, from my reading of the initial draft, it's not clear how BEPL will
be applied.  Is this just to allow implementation of agents using a
workflow or orchestration engine, or is it intended to represent
Choreography-style service instructions embedded in the message?

Like I said, I'm not trying to be hyper-critical, I'm just very curious
to see how these things work in a "genuine" WS-* model vs. what we're
doing.  As I'm in Ireland, I'm not sure how practical it is for me to
actively contribute, but I am interested in participating in this effort
in some capacity.

Thanks for listening,

ast

On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 01:47, Brand Niemann wrote:
> Thanks and I will try to make this. I am speaking at a conference just
> before this. Brand
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Cory Casanave
>         To: 'Cory Casanave' ; 'Service-Oriented Architecture CoP'
>         Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 8:51 PM
>         Subject: [soa-forum] RE: SOA Community Demo Con Call
>        
>        
>         Ok this is set for 11AM, Thursday March 23rd
>        
>         Phone number: 641-297-5900
>        
>         Access code: 41677
>        
>        
>        
>         As usual, not all could make it â?' but most can so lets go for
>         it.
>        
>         -Cory Casanave
>        
>        
>        
>                                      
>         ______________________________________________________________
>        
>         From: Cory Casanave [mailto:cbc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>         Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:20 PM
>         To: 'Service-Oriented Architecture CoP'
>         Subject: SOA Community Demo Con Call
>        
>        
>        
>        
>         I would like to propose a con-call for the core team of the
>         SOA demo this Thursday @ 10:30 â?'  11:30.  if there are any
>         critical conflicts please let me know.
>        
>         Current demo straw man:
>         http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SOACoP/SOA%20Community%20of%20Practice%20Demo.doc (Unchanged)
>        
>        
>        
>         This is an open process but there will certainly be a core
>         team that will be organizing the effort and doing a lot of the
>         work.  At this point anyone who asks is part of the core team.
>        
>         People who have expressed interest in being on the core team:
>        
>          ·      Allen Matthew, Joe Chiusano (BAH)
>        
>          ·      Greg Lomow (Bearingpoint)
>        
>          ·      Larry Johnson (Tethers End/OMG)
>        
>          ·      Brand Niemann (Government Sponsor - Participation
>         Assumed)
>        
>        
>        
>         Meeting goal â?' initial plan to start work on the demo.
>        
>          ·      Validate/raise issues with current spec
>        
>          ·      Governance/Work structure
>        
>          ·      Identify participant roles
>        
>        
>        
>         --Roles--
>        
>         Executable Enterprise Architecture Role
>        
>         The operational role in the project we (DAT) are volunteering
>         for is to produce an Enterprise-MDA architecture of the
>         subject community.  This will identify the roles,
>         collaboration and community interactions.  This can then be
>         used by the group to validate the architecture in more detail
>         and then to produce (generate) the candidate service
>         specifications that would be implemented by the participants.
>        
>        
>        
>         Meeting logistics to be sent out once the time is confirmed.
>        
>        
>        
>         Regards,
>        
>         Cory Casanave
>        
>         Data Access Technologies, Inc.
>        
>        
>        
>        
>        
>         ______________________________________________________________
>        
>         _________________________________________________________________
>         Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>         http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
>         Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
>         Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
>         Community Wiki:
>         http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
> Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
> Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
--
Join me in Dubrovnik, Croatia on May 8-10th when I will be speaking at
InfoSeCon 2006.  For more information, see www.infosecon.org.

***************************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
***************************************************************************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP
 _________________________________________________________________
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/soa-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/soa/
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AnnouncementofSOACoP    (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>