[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontac-forum] A potential defining vocabulary for definitions

To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:27:53 -0700
Message-id: <43528D99.6050709@xxxxxxxx>
Good question, Denise.    (01)

The reason why I was bringing up my questions to Pat (and the 
rest of the community) is to make sure that this potential 
defining vocabulary for definitions is a deliberated choice.    (02)

Regards.  =ppy
--    (03)

dbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:24:52 -0400:
> Peter,
> Are you all looking at dictionaries to identify labels for grammatical 
> variations?  Or, are you actually proposing to use the values in the 
> dictionaries?
> Best regards,
> Denise    (04)

Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>