[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontac-forum] Addition to Agenda for Oct.5 meeting.

To: "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Cassidy, Patrick J." <pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 00:32:33 -0400
Message-id: <6ACD6742E291AF459206FFF2897764BE51CC2A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   I added numbers to your slides so remote participants can follow if
they can't get the VNC (this is a problem with strict firewalls).  Is
this OK?    (01)

   I was looking at your slides, and it looks like there is a lot of
similarity in some of the objectives.  I expect the ONTACWG, if it can
make any progress at all, to benefit directly from the NCOR work.
   It appears from your slides that the same relation string can be
class-level or instance-level depending on the font (bold/normal).  Is
this just for the presentation, or is it something you think would work
in a functioning system?  (I haven't seen this used before).    (02)

   Best regards,
   Pat    (03)

Patrick Cassidy
MITRE Corporation
260 Industrial Way
Eatontown, NJ 07724
Mail Stop: MNJE
Phone: 732-578-6340
Cell: 908-565-4053
Fax: 732-578-6012
Email: pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx    (04)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontac-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Smith, Barry
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 7:00 PM
To: ONTAC-WG General Discussion
Subject: Re: [ontac-forum] Addition to Agenda for Oct.5 meeting.    (05)

My slides are attached.
Do we need to do a practice run?
With greetings,
Barry    (06)

Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>