To: | ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion <ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:58:45 -0500 |
Message-id: | <43CE8FE5.6060107@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
No one is suggesting that: (01) > ... rather than saying a dog is a subtype of animal. (02) The correct syntax is: (03) "A dog is an instance of the type Dog." (04) "The type Dog is a subtype of the type Animal." (05) More simply, you can just drop the word "type" in most discussions: (06) "A dog is an instance of Dog." (07) "Dog is a subtype of Animal." (08) The advantage of using these last two sentence forms is that they are independent of any choice of words for Dog or Animal. (09) John Sowa (010) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/ To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (011) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | FW: [BPDM] Process and Ontologies (Was RE: [ontac-dev] Shall we start ), Cory Casanave |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [ontac-dev] Type vs. Class et al., Arsic, Antoinette |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [ontac-dev] Type vs. Class et al., Arsic, Antoinette |
Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-dev] Type vs. Class et al., Hans Teijgeler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |