drm-public
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [drm-public] Fw: DRM Documents Comments

To: "Sall, Kenneth B. " <KENNETH.B.SALL@xxxxxxxx>, "FEA-DRM Public Forum" <drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
From: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:25:32 -0500
Message-id: <10bc01c5e58d$435dd720$1401a8c0@family575i3htt>
Actually
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChiefArchitectsForum/HowToCommentDRM#nid2ZVF    (01)

Brand    (02)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sall, Kenneth B. " <KENNETH.B.SALL@xxxxxxxx>
To: "FEA-DRM Public Forum" <drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Brand Niemann"
<bniemann@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [drm-public] Fw: DRM Documents Comments    (03)


> I believe Brand meant to type
>
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChiefArchitectsForum/HowToCommentDRM#n
> id2ZVF
>
>
> Give me a http://tinyurl.com/ any day!
>
>
> Ken Sall, SAIC
> sallk@xxxxxxxx
> cell:    301-672-3269
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: drm-public-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:drm-public-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Arsic, Antoinette
> Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 11:31 AM
> To: Brand Niemann; FEA-DRM Public Forum
> Subject: RE: [drm-public] Fw: DRM Documents Comments
>
> I get an error message for that link. And it does copy the entire link.
>
>
>
>
> Antoinette Arsic
> Sr. Information Systems Engineer
> The MITRE Corporation
> 703-337-9016 (VOIP)
> *703-983-5286 (new office number, was 883)
> *443-567-2703 (new cell)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: drm-public-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:drm-public-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brand Niemann
> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 5:27 PM
> To: drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [drm-public] Fw: DRM Documents Comments
>
> I forgot to post the comments in this email history and those posted to
> the
> Wiki as part of the DRM Virtual Workshops #1-3 at
> http://colab.com3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChiefArchitectForum/HowToCommentD
> RM#nid2ZVF
>
> Brand
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Daconta, Michael" <Michael.Daconta@xxxxxxx>; "Manns, Cheryl P"
> <Cheryl.Manns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <susan.turnbull@xxxxxxx>; <Mccaffery.Mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'Mills
> Davis'" <mdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:47 AM
> Subject: Re: DRM Documents Comments
>
>
> > Mike, Thanks, and thanks for your continuing leadership.
> >
> > Given the problems with the PDF version of the DM Strategy and the
> figures
> > and tables in the Specification, I repurposed both documents into one
> > structured-searchable XML document and tried to improve the figures
> and
> > tables, as well as use it to illustrate a "Conceptual Metamodel for
> DRM
> 2.0
> > Implementation" for our DRM Education Pilot. See
> >
> http://web-services.gov/lpBin22/lpext.dll/Folder17/Infobase7/1?fn=main-
> j.htm&f=templates&2.0
> >
> > I have asked Mills to distill our ITIT Team's thoughts on an
> Implementation
> > Strategy that deals with the issues that Azad, I, and others have
> raised
> for
> > the DRM 2.0 Virtual Workshops Conference Call tomorrow
> >
> (http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ChiefArchitectsForum/HowToCommen
> tDRM)
> >
> > Brand
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Daconta, Michael" <Michael.Daconta@xxxxxxx>
> > To: <bniemann@xxxxxxx>; "Manns, Cheryl P"
> <Cheryl.Manns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <susan.turnbull@xxxxxxx>; <Mccaffery.Mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: DRM Documents Comments
> >
> >
> > Hi Brand,
> > Truly superb comments that are right on the mark.
> > Regards,
> > - Mike
> > --------------------------
> > Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brand Niemann <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
> > To: Manns, Cheryl P <Cheryl.Manns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Daconta, Michael <Michael.Daconta@xxxxxxx>;
> susan.turnbull@xxxxxxx
> > <susan.turnbull@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Mon Oct 24 18:00:13 2005
> > Subject: DRM Documents Comments
> >
> > Per our teleconference, here are my suggestions:
> >
> > 1. Have the figures professionally drafted since they are currently
> very
> > uneven in quality and readability and they usually are what gives
> reviewers
> > the most lasting impressions.
> >
> > 2. Fix the gaps in the Appendices (E and F are blank and C has "B"
> labeling
> > and several gaps - parts C.2 and C.4). It looks like maybe Section
> 3.6.2
> is
> > for Appendix E.
> >
> > 3. There are some Figure numbering problems in the main body which I
> fixed
> > in my repurposed version so I could keep it straight myself.
> >
> > The three overall concerns I have about the harmonization/education
> process
> > going forward are:
> >
> > 1. The serious disconnect between the specification and the
> management
> > strategy (e.g. how do you get from where we are now to "What is
> required
> of
> > agencies?" as was raised in the call today and how do we answer those
> > questions.) This is, of course, the role of the Implementation
> chapter,
> but
> > the ultimate role of OMB/FEA-PMO to decide how to use the DRM in the
> FEA
> and
> > Budget process. I agree with Mike's quote in GCN that the role of
> > implementation is to test to better understand what should be
> mandatory
> and
> > what should be optional, but that is still the ultimate decisions of
> the
> > OMB/FEA-PMO.
> >
> > 2. The GSA RFI responses and how those should/could factor into the
> DRM -
> I
> > heard that today Kim tended to separate the DRM for "data
> architecture"
> from
> > the Search for "efficient retrieval of information" and I think that
> > seriously limits the value of the DRM to the government.
> >
> > 3. The "Action Oriented Road Map" in the "What is required of
> agencies"
> > seems to ignore that we would need a DRM 3.0, etc. to make that
> happen -
> the
> > DRM CoI needs to continue the collaborative process so these
> documents are
> > not the end of the most important output for all of this. The
> Individual
> > CoI's need the direction from and participation of the DRM CoI for at
> least
> > several years.
> >
> >
> > Brand
> >
>
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/drm-public/
> To Post: mailto:drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/drm-public/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/drm/
> Community Wiki:
> http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DataReferenceModel
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/drm-public/
> To Post: mailto:drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
> http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/drm-public/
> Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/drm/
> Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DataReferenceModel
>    (04)

 _________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/drm-public/
To Post: mailto:drm-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/drm-public/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/drm/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?DataReferenceModel    (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>