Jim, (01)
Can you please add Don Conklin (Lockheed Martin Semantic Web SME) to our
distribution? Don is leading similar efforts within LM and his expertise
can be of great help. He has fought the wars from the trenches. (02)
Frank (03)
-----Original Message-----
From: cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:32 AM
To: 'common upper ontology working group'
Subject: [cuo-wg] FW: Latest Draft Paper: "Data Interoperability across th e
Enterprise - Why Current Technology Cannot Achieve it" (04)
For those who may have missed this over the holidays: (05)
-----Original Message-----
From: cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 4:46 PM
To: 'common upper ontology working group'
Subject: [cuo-wg] Latest Draft Paper: "Data Interoperability across the
Enterprise - Why Current Technology Cannot Achieve it" (06)
CDSI WG, (07)
Thanks to all for your valuable input. (08)
Attached is latest draft of the paper, with most of the comments
addressed. Please review and submit further proposed changes. Broad
comments are welcome, but are often too hard to nail down or work with. At
this stage, please submit specific proposed changes in the form [change
"XXXXXXX" to "YYYYYYY"]. (09)
1. Comment: Paragraph on "Semantic Web community" needs to be more positive
Proposed Resolution: Paragraph heading changed to "World Wide Web Consortium
(W3C) Doing Much - But Not This." Rewrote most of this paragraph. (010)
2. Comment: Explain CDSI is not the end-all, other barriers also exist.
Proposed Resolution: Added this to end of paragraph F: "Beyond Semantic
Interoperability, in the figure above, are the Logic, Proof, and Trust
layers, which are critical also. For example, if computers could someday
search the Semantic Web and find and understand a source of data, they would
still need to determine if they could 'trust' the data for the intended
purpose. Solving Semantic Interoperability will not provide the total
solution to enterprise data interoperability, but it is a major portion of
this challenge." (011)
3. Comment: Need better definition of data interoperability.
Proposed Resolution: Changed heading of Part-I, Paragraph F to read "Data
Interoperability has Multiple Layers -- All Critical. This paragraph could
probably be improved to better define the many layers of data
interoperability. Any volunteers? (012)
4. Comment: Add use case(s) to better explain requirements Proposed
Resolution: One Use Case added after Abstract. Additional Use Cases could
be placed in an Appendix or the body of the paper. Any volunteers to draft
them? (013)
5. Comment: Is goal no-humans-in-loop, or is some amount acceptable?
Proposed Resolution: DoD Netcentricity requires "unanticipated" use of
data, by humans and applications. So, the goal is no-humans-in-the-loop.
That is not possible today, so we do what we can. If it is never possible
(which we don't know), we will have to do what we can. But this paper calls
for the pursuit of the goal. (014)
6. Comment: Define Intended Audience
Proposed Resolution: "Intended Audience" paragraph added after Abstract on
page 2. (015)
Additional comments were submitted via email and will be responded to in
separate emails, but the proposed changes are included in the attached
draft. (016)
James R. Schoening
C-E LCMC CIO/G6 Office
Voice: DSN 992-5812 or (732) 532-5812
Fax: DSN 992-7551 or (732) 532-7551
Email: James.Schoening@xxxxxxxxxxx (017)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG (018)
|