I can't participate in the teleconference, but do have a comment. This
is not really a rating per se, but rather a software readiness level.
Interpreted this way, the numbers look more reasonable (with the
possible exception of the OWL one). Note the comment just below the
rating table:
XML, RDF,
and OWL may be
mature, but can’t achieve enterprise data interoperability. Upper and mapped upper ontologies potentially
can solve this problem, but are not mature enough for implementation.
This is, IMHO, a bit more like it.
-- Misty
Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6 wrote:
Cory,
Appendix 2 and the overall paper should provide the basis and context.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Cory Casanave
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:48 AM
To: common upper ontology working group
Subject: Re: [cuo-wg] How would you rate these semantic technologies? ConferenceCall Wed Dec 20, 11:30-12:30
Jim,
Rate on what basis?
-----Original Message-----
From: cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cuo-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:49 AM
To: 'common upper ontology working group'
Subject: [cuo-wg] How would you rate these semantic technologies?
ConferenceCall Wed Dec 20, 11:30-12:30
CDSI,
The attached paper rates the following semantic technologies:
Technology: Score: (See Appendix 2 for scale)
XML/Metadata 9
RDF 9
OWL 9
Stand-alone ontologies 6
Upper Ontologies 4
Mapped Upper Ontologies 1
What's your opinion? Join us for tomorrow's teleconference and let's discuss. Details below
Jim Schoening
-----Original Message-----
From: Schoening, James R C-E LCMC CIO/G6
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:45 AM
To: common upper ontology working group
Subject: CDSI Draft Paper and Conference Call Wed Dec 20, 11:30-12:30
Cross Domain Semantic Interoperability WG,
The 2nd conference call of this group is scheduled for next
Wednesday, Dec 20th, 11:30 AM -12:30 PM EST. Join by dialing
(888)622-5357 and entering the code 342803.
Attached is a draft paper, which will be discussed. The paper attempts to explain, to the layman, that current technology cannot achieve 'Data Interoperability across the Enterprise.' It concludes
that emerging technology has promise and should be pursued. It makes a
first cut at rating various technologies on a 9-level maturity scale, which needs further discussion.
Please join the telecon and invite other stakeholders. The
CDSI-WG web site is at http://www.visualknowledge.com/wiki/CDSI.
James R. Schoening
U.S. Army C-E LCMC CIO/G6 Office
Voice: DSN 992-5812 or (732) 532-5812
Fax: DSN 992-7551 or (732) 532-7551
Email: James.Schoening@xxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG
|
nodine.vcf
Description: Vcard
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/
To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/
Community Wiki:
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG (01)
|