[Top] [All Lists]

[ontac-forum] critic over the use of logic in ontology

To: <protege-owl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ONTAC-WG General Discussion <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Paul S Prueitt" <psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:06:17 -0700
Message-id: <CBEELNOPAHIKDGBGICBGEEGPHAAA.psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Andrea Proli    (01)

I have posted your kind note at    (02)

http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/nationalDebate/326.htm    (03)

and added some foot notes to address specific issues.    (04)

I then extended slightly these foot notes at    (05)

http://www.ontologystream.com/beads/nationalDebate/327.htm    (06)

so that the reading of our discussion would be as easy as possible.    (07)

At this point, we have said allot.  I am for letting others make comments
for a week and then perhaps return to this discussion based on some
reflection.    (08)

I am grateful for the collogue.    (09)

Paul Prueitt
Taos New Mexico    (010)

Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (011)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>