ontac-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [ontac-forum] ONTACWG and Discussions on fundamental ontology issues

To: "ONTAC-WG General Discussion" <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Paul S Prueitt" <psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:47:08 -0700
Message-id: <CBEELNOPAHIKDGBGICBGKEFHHAAA.psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Patrick,    (01)


You said:
"
The general discussions of basic issues on the ONTACWG list have
touched on topics that are very much related to the question of how to
create effective knowledge representations, but the immediate focus of
the ONTACWG is much narrower, with a near-term goal to create
information artifacts that will be useful to help people create
knowledge classification systems and relate them to each other."    (02)

Your contrast    (03)

topics that are very much related to the question of how to
create effective knowledge representations    (04)


with    (05)

create information artifacts that will be useful to help people create
knowledge classification systems and relate them to each other    (06)


Some of us do not see how one can do the second without some agreement on
the first.    (07)


Your comment?    (08)





_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/
To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (09)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>