To: | <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Gary Berg-Cross" <gary.berg-cross@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:44:49 -0400 |
Message-id: | <330E3C69AFABAE45BD91B28F80BE32C9056258@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Denise , You mentioned the possible use of thence registry, based
on ISO 11179 (data element definition) for ontologies. >Its partitioned
into 'Contexts' so its conceivable that one could be set up for Ontology
Working Group' project, if its a close enough fit...the idea of
independently entering concepts and allowing them to be classified into
multiple classification schemes is easily supported - with a few >
additional business rules to support the ONTAC Context it might be an easy way
to get going? This may be useful, but I’d like to know something about
your top level concepts that categorize and organize the data
elements. I know that Frank Olken has discussed how ontologies can
support ISO/IEC 11179 registries and listed the following
reasons:
The third item, registering ontologies, is just what you
propose. It has always seemed to me, however, that defining
elements in relative isolation hides the really hard aspect of ontology as an
integrated model. Thus the approach
of building up an ontology from data elements semantics may be
deceptively simple for a while and then run into a steep incline. Gary
Berg-Cross EM&I _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-forum/ To Post: mailto:ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-forum/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] Surveyed Ontology "Library" Systems, Obrst, Leo J. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [ontac-forum] Surveyed Ontology "Library" Systems, Barry Smith |
Previous by Thread: | [ontac-forum] Adequate ontologies and better ontological analysis for enterprise architecture models, Gary Berg-Cross |
Next by Thread: | RE: [ontac-forum] Questions and thoughts on using a 11179 registry for ontology registration, Warzel, Denise (NIH/NCI) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |