To: | "ONTAC Taxonomy-Ontology Development Discussion" <ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Cassidy, Patrick J." <pcassidy@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 4 Feb 2006 09:14:01 -0500 |
Message-id: | <6ACD6742E291AF459206FFF2897764BE887E52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Chuck,
I think we need to get agreement quickly on
the way we will represent attributes, since that is an important component of
how to specify the meanings of "Process" and "Event".
I have posted a recommendation on the basic
elements of the representation of attributes (to be elaborated after agreement
is reached on the basics). The posting was sent to a new e-mail list
that was set up for discussion of technical issues related to the structure of
the COSMO. To subscribe to that list, go to:
Pat
Patrick Cassidy
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/ To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Categorization (was RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes), Smith, Barry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Categorization (was RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes), Cory Casanave |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Categorization (was RE: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes), Chris Menzel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontac-dev] Representation of attributes - new technical discussion list, Roberto Bordogna |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |