ontac-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontac-dev] Rules and classes

To: ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:58:16 -0600
Message-id: <20060118175816.GJ5331@xxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Barry Smith wrote:
> At 01:07 AM 1/18/2006, John F. Sowa wrote:
> 
> >   A _type_ t is a rule or specification for classifying entities,
> >   concrete or abstract.  Any entity that has the characteristics
> >   specified by the type t is called an _instance_ of t.
> 
> Something wrong here, surely.
> 
> This would mean that Fido is an instance of a rule for classifying
> entities.    (01)

Surely Barry is right.  Classes -- or whatever we agree to call them --
are *semantic entities* (or, "Thingies", in my preferred technical
terminology :-), the semantic values of noun phrases like "dog" and
"tired, hungry philosopher".  Rules and specifications are linguistic
items that can *refer* to classes, or perhaps provide a means for
identifying their instances, but a rule is no more a class than the name
"John Sowa" is a man.     (02)

-chris    (03)

ps: Pat has set up the ontac-dev list for this crowd -- let's use it!    (04)

pps: While I'm in an obnoxious and overbearing netiquette guy role :-) ,
let me suggest that we revise Subject headers when msg content drifts 
markedly in the course of a thread.    (05)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/ontac-dev/
To Post: mailto:ontac-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontac-dev/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/ontac/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/OntologyTaxonomyCoordinatingWG    (06)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>