geo-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

[geo-forum] Geospatial Profile Pilot Call Notes, January 5

To: GEO EA Working Group <geo-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Doug Nebert <ddnebert@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:52:24 -0500
Message-id: <43BD78F8.5090505@xxxxxxxx>
Partial list of call attendees (I joined late):    (01)

Brenda Smith, EPA
Michael Alford, SRA (EPA)
Ken Adee, USFS
Mary McCaffery, AIC
Julia Harrell, NCDENR
Raj Singh, OGC
Kathy Covert, FGDC
Kurt Buehler, DHS/GMO
Twyla McDermott, Charlotte NC
Nadine Alameh, NASA    (02)

Pilot is about validating the methodologies in the Geospatial Profile, 
not really focused on building an application. Find organizations and a 
common line of business - if we give it to them, have them work together 
with the methodology on a common thread, see how it helps them improve 
and exploit geospatial capabilities. Feedback and update to the Profile 
and the Reference Models, develop or identify best practices.    (03)

It's about following the standards and practices. Collaboration with AIC 
and other Profiles is an important area of outreach. The AIC will be 
meeting on the 19th, offer to collaborate and lead to implementation 
around a mission critical solution. Disaster management and emergency 
response should resonate. Raises awareness to CIO Council senior 
leadership and agency connections.    (04)

Need this pilot and Profile to reinforce the value of enterprise 
architecture in a multi-organizational environment. The problem space 
must focus on aligned LoB in multiple organizations. Needs to have 
support at a high level that could cause investment and implementation. 
Pick LoB that overlaps the most agencies to get maximum penetration. 
Look for LoB that have strong State and Local interest.    (05)

Need a common understanding of "solutions architecture." Chief 
Architects Forum does define "solutions architecture." Perhaps we need 
to develop and deliver a solutions architecture and lead to 
implementation. Our community can offer guidance on how geospatial 
elements can be brought into. A solutions architecture is a subset of 
SRM, DRM, and TRM that addresses a specific business requirement.    (06)

It is critical to get sense of what senior management feels is most 
important -- they lay out LoB and related areas (incl GOS) that are of 
high relevance. Recommendations for enhancements to GOS could come from 
a pilot. Build up GOS relationship as selling point.    (07)

Question: are EAs done by agency and independently, or is there a common 
solutions architecture? Answer: Both need to be true - rally around a 
common problem or event, make internal EA's align using the direction of 
the Profile document to solve internal and external mission needs.    (08)

There is a government-wide LoB for emergency management and each hagency 
has a business process that implements it. Find agencies that touch 
that, evaluate their BRMs together around a problem, to resolve more 
detail business processes that define geospatial, yielding common BRM 
approaches.    (09)

DRM is piloting cross-agency initiatives and specific agency solutions. 
Perhaps several agencies may only evaluate the Profile, to supplement 
the pilot's collaboration mode. We do not identify BRM elements that are 
cross-agency in the way the other profiles do.    (010)

Deliver the proposal to the AIC on Jan 19th, request input and feedback 
for 'blessing' of senior management on the pilot effort. Declaration of 
a common LoB activity would get federal agency resources committed for a 
community of practice.    (011)

Regarding DRM comment period: Jan 30th can provide changes/changes for 
the DRM. Three functions from the Profile need to be propagated in DRM: 
develop geospatial policy and standards guidance, implement geospatial 
services, disseminate geospatial data to users. The GEOCoP can submit 
recommendations. Could take disaster management through these.    (012)

Workplan might need elaboration on 1) internal EA versus cross-agency 
collaboration environment, and 2) better sense of framing a common 
scenario - details to follow from consultation with AIC.    (013)

North Carolina DENR will participate at the state level; City of 
Charlotte, NC will also participate. Federal agencies have significant 
LoB interests and overlaps.    (014)

Next steps: take today's comments, hold another discussion prior to the 
19th, refine the plan, build a presentation to the AIC to get buy-in and 
advice.    (015)

Next call: Thursday, January 12 at 1pm EST, same number
-- 
Douglas D. Nebert
Geospatial Data Clearinghouse Coordinator, Information Architect
FGDC/GSDI Secretariat   Phone: +1 703 648 4151  Fax: +1 703 648-5755    (016)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/geo-forum/
To Post: mailto:geo-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/geo-forum/
Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/
Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/geocop/
Community Wiki: 
http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GeoSpatialCommunityofPractice    (017)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>