|
-----Original Message-----
From: Mayk, Israel RDECOM CERDEC C2D Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 6:27 PM To: Schoening, James R CECOM DCSC4I Subject: RE: Common Upper Ontology WG: Alternatives for Participation or Monitoring Jim,
Attached is a paper on the SINCE program, that I
promised to provide you today as an example of an upper ontology success story.
Even though it does not use any of the three prime candidate for an upper
ontology, it clearly demonstrates the value of an upper ontology for
integration, federation, collaboration and interoprability of systems with
heterogeneous ontologies. Our "upper ontology" XML schema for W6H (Who (
Whom.Which), What, When, Where when Why and How was used for the mapping and
representing C2 information products such as OPORDs and Situation Reports among
the SINCE federates. It would be interesting to see how each of the prime
candidates for an upper ontology map to the W6H schema.
Israel
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://colab.cim3.net/forum/cuo-wg/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: http://colab.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/cuo-wg/ To Post: mailto:cuo-wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Portal: http://colab.cim3.net/ Shared Files: http://colab.cim3.net/file/work/SICoP/cuo-wg/ Community Wiki: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/CommonUpperOntologyWG (01) |
